Free climbing poles
#81
Posted 06 October 2008 - 03:57 PM
I am currently in a lineman school and we learned free climbing first, then hitch hitchiking (which I've always hated) and now we're using the Buck Squeeze method. Dominion Power came to our school last week and said that they thought OSHA would mandate the Buck Squeeze system for EVERYONE in early 2009. So like it or not, it's coming.
#82
Posted 12 November 2008 - 05:05 PM
#83
Posted 12 November 2008 - 08:47 PM
So the management DO know about defibrillators and have them in the offices for themselves, but the guys who routinely work on live electrical equipment DON'T have them.....
I think that's something worth remembering when one of the workers does get electrocuted. Something like that would make a scandalous news headline.
I had asked that question at one of my apprentice classes for cpr and the answer that my instructor gave me is that if we leave them in the trucks all of the time the hot and cold could damange the device and would not work when we really need it. I also asked why don't our GF'S have them in their trucks and he replied how hard is it to get ahold of your gf when there is not an emergency let alone a serious problem.
#84
Posted 01 December 2008 - 02:28 AM
the company that i worked. they usually use high lifter to make the work done easily.. but sometime we use ladder for interior
#85
Posted 03 December 2008 - 09:29 PM
-M|]{E-
Catv Lineman 2127
#86
Posted 23 December 2008 - 07:25 PM
now we've got to deal with this buck strap crap
you all stay save and enjoy it while you can
#87
Posted 29 December 2008 - 07:32 PM
Kinda hard to picture it but the buck squeeze wraps the entire pole instead of just the back half. if you gaff out it squeezes the pole and you dont go anywhere. they suck, suck bad, suck real bad. But, if it saves someones legs, neck, back or life, then i guess it was worth it.
Edited by 8buck, 29 December 2008 - 07:33 PM.
#88
Posted 10 February 2009 - 06:29 PM
#89
Posted 10 February 2009 - 06:41 PM
#90
Posted 10 February 2009 - 08:00 PM
I believe most of us that have been around for 10--20 years or more started free climbing,
It's a little thing called liability on the behalf of the companies by thier insurance agents and a lack of climbing training and knowledge due to all the bucket work now. I know most of the new guys here (power, telco & cable) all seem to prefer to carry a 80lb ladder backlot instead of a set of spurs
lightningrod
#91
Posted 11 February 2009 - 06:19 AM
climbin linemen are a thing of the past
#92
Posted 11 February 2009 - 09:43 AM
safety.bmp 791.07K
75 downloadsYou guys are just following us. I started this thread almost 3 yrs ago and have read all the other crap everyone has to use and I'm with you Burnitup, it could be a lot worse.
And by the way, it's good for 5000#. This is my first one and I actually used it to pull a Sheriffs car out of a ditch one day.
It has some use after all.........
#93
Posted 22 March 2009 - 09:33 AM
contraption.
#94
Posted 25 May 2009 - 10:53 AM
Back in November 2008 I was in Salt Lake City at a safety seminar and met the owner of the Jelco Pole Chockers. Even though the company I work for has not changed any of the climbing rules I still free climb and use the Jelco Pole Chocker as well. I have found it very usefull on ice and leaning poles. I also use the pole chocker if I am going to be on a pole for a long period of time. If and when the climbing rule changes at my company I will be ready.
The Jelco Pole Chocker is easy to use and there isn't as many adjustments as the Buck Squeeze that I have seen. I personally do not like the Buck Squeeze and will not use it. I have heard of some cut outs with the Buck Squeeze but have not heard of any cut outs on the Jelco Pole Chocker. I let the young apprentices use my Jelco Pole Chocker and they like it. I would highly recommend trying the Jelco Pole Chocker vs. the Buck Squeeze for yourself to see which one you feel stands out and is the better choice for you. By no means would I let the "Brass" choose which one I would use.
The one thing that caught my eye with Jelco Pole Chocker is the person that owns the company takes the product to the field, to the linemen in the field and talks as well as demos the product themself. how many owners do you see bring the product to the field. This is the owner not a sales rep. One thing I heard the owner say about the Pole Chocker is it was designed by a lineman made for a lineman.
#95
Posted 27 May 2009 - 04:44 AM
I just graduated from college where we climbed without a buck squeeze. We had them there to use because most of the companies are switching over to them and asked the instructors to teach the students how to use them. I believe there is nothing wrong with saftey but what I did see was that the students that were "not comfortable" to put in nicely, climbing were scared to climb above a cross arm without the buck squeeze. It concerned mw because when we did pole top rescues these same students would only climb with the buck squeeze. It took them a long time to get up there to help. In my opinion, I believe first time climbers need to learn how to climb without the buck squeeze so they are able to gain confidence in there abilities and get comfortable in the proper work positions. I know next years class had to buy the polariat (don't know if that's the proper spelling) by bashlin. It's there version of the buck squeeze.
#96
Posted 30 May 2009 - 03:59 PM
Well, with all the BS coming down the pike, that is exactly what we are doing. If you have clearance between conductors, drop you on top. If you don't, let you on the ground, drop the line in between, and pick you back up. You have to see it to believe it. Here's a pic at training, not a good one & a little far away, but right over the center hat is the copter landing a lineman on a pole........
The old " Dope on a Rope " ,,,,,, gotta love Pg&e W.S.
#97
Posted 17 June 2009 - 06:02 PM
Edited by Onecell, 17 June 2009 - 06:03 PM.
#98
Posted 03 March 2010 - 02:43 PM
#99
Posted 18 January 2011 - 03:52 PM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users










