I have a friend that found out the hard way that microwave tower emit extremely dangerous amounts of radiation the hard way. Now that he's been looking into it, he's seeing that companies are installing these mini- microwave sites onto or nearby poles. Are any of you being trained about exposure and are any of you seeing them being installed onto your poles?
Read more about RF Radiation here
http://www.alikelydeath.com/index_Page438.htm
RF radiation exposure
Started by Tha Bobster, Feb 15 2010 09:45 AM
6 replies to this topic
#2
Posted 15 February 2010 - 10:31 AM
We have a few on our tower at the headend, but haven't seen any on poles yet. Thanks for the warning though. I'll be on the look out for them now.
Jason C.
Broadband Maintenance Technician
CDE Lightband
Clarksville, TN
Broadband Maintenance Technician
CDE Lightband
Clarksville, TN
#3
Posted 15 February 2010 - 02:40 PM
QUOTE (Tha Bobster @ Feb 15 2010, 11:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I have a friend that found out the hard way that microwave tower emit extremely dangerous amounts of radiation the hard way. Now that he's been looking into it, he's seeing that companies are installing these mini- microwave sites onto or nearby poles. Are any of you being trained about exposure and are any of you seeing them being installed onto your poles?
It's not just on poles. Here is a link to something a little closer to home>>>
Is your cell phone really safe?
Dak
#4
Posted 15 February 2010 - 02:59 PM
QUOTE (Tha Bobster @ Feb 15 2010, 09:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I have a friend that found out the hard way that microwave tower emit extremely dangerous amounts of radiation the hard way. Now that he's been looking into it, he's seeing that companies are installing these mini- microwave sites onto or nearby poles. Are any of you being trained about exposure and are any of you seeing them being installed onto your poles?
Read more about RF Radiation here
http://www.alikelydeath.com/index_Page438.htm
Read more about RF Radiation here
http://www.alikelydeath.com/index_Page438.htm
check out what the IBEW says on the issue:
http://www.ibew.org/articles/08daily/0809/...ltelVerizon.htm
#5
Posted 21 March 2010 - 07:57 PM
I work around it all the time.
It can be very dangerous if you do not know the safe approach distances.
Much can be found on the internet, look into RF Exposure Guidelines....
http://www.google.co...e8f9588018abe0f
It can be very dangerous if you do not know the safe approach distances.
Much can be found on the internet, look into RF Exposure Guidelines....
http://www.google.co...e8f9588018abe0f
#6
Posted 21 March 2010 - 08:14 PM
phreak, on 21 March 2010 - 07:57 PM, said:
It can be very dangerous if you do not know the safe approach distances.
Distance along with erp (radiated power) is the key item, for sure.
What the 'safe' exposure is, I think the levels are still unknown.
Anyone notice the roll-out of the new remote power meter reading hubs ?
Some hydro companies are creating a cell-type radio system to read hydro meters remotely.
These hubs can be mounted to poles, typically down close to the tel/catv stuff (where they
can link back to the central computer via modem/etc).
Now us lower-strand guys get some cell transmitters down close to our 'nads'.. nice..
#7
Posted 22 March 2010 - 04:47 PM
Yes, it is all based on frequency, transmitter power, and antenna gain. All of which provide you the ability to determine approach distances.
I don't know what types of systems are being deployed for AMR/AMI in the various areas but there are several frequencies available. The systems I have dealt with were 1.3GHz, VHF, and 900MHz.
I don't know what types of systems are being deployed for AMR/AMI in the various areas but there are several frequencies available. The systems I have dealt with were 1.3GHz, VHF, and 900MHz.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











