DOCSIS 3.0
#141
Posted 07 October 2010 - 06:27 PM
#142
Posted 07 October 2010 - 08:17 PM
Edited by Thunderstruck, 07 October 2010 - 08:43 PM.
#143
Posted 08 October 2010 - 05:01 AM
Got anything else Jonathan???
#144
Posted 10 September 2011 - 09:43 AM
#145
Posted 30 August 2012 - 01:09 AM
What are you talking about You have a tap that will adjust the return aside from the foward???
Post a picture
olo131
Mayby I missed the info about these taps. (in that long topic).
But I noticed this recent contribution/forum:
http://www.line-man....__fromsearch__1
"Google search"
http://www.cisco.com...ecd806c7a31.pdf
http://www.cisco.com...091/7022397.pdf
73 Willy.
#146
Posted 30 August 2012 - 06:21 AM
lmao i kid i kid, we are still 1.1 here. we offer 7dn .05 up lmao
but some of our modems are wide open and we can get about 20-25mg dn 2-3up
#147
Posted 07 September 2012 - 05:10 PM
#148
Posted 10 September 2012 - 01:54 AM
My (test) modem at home :) that is one of advantage when you are employed in cable company.
Docsis 3.0
"KOPERNIKUS" Cable Company, Serbia
We are offering speed from 3/0,5 Mbit/s to 50/2 Mbit/s. Four channel bonding in downstream and two (on some place four) channel bonding in upstream. In this year, we are gonna bond everywhere four channel in upstream.
But here, in Serbia we are using Eurodocsis an that give us a lot of free space in return path (5-65 Mhz) in comparation with Docsis (5-42)...
Edited by jetsetwily, 10 September 2012 - 02:07 AM.
#149
Posted 10 September 2012 - 07:32 PM
Because of the way D3 works, you have to run the test a few times to force the modem to open up a bit.
Also, I might note, this stems from my problem with my Trilithic meter: If you're running a Cisco CMTS, and you have 8-channel bonding in place - 4-channel modems will not bond at all. So far, every 4-channel modem I've encountered has failed to bond. Its a problem with the CMTS software it seems. (sending incorrect rcp messages) If I set the CMTS wideband interface back to 4, the 4-channel modem locks right on. So, needless to say, we're only buying 8x4 modems here.
Arris did actually have a workaround for this in their firmware, but it seems motorola and hitron (makers of the trilithic modems) have not clued into this - afaik at this time. If CISCO would fix their CMTS software, that would be the more correct thing to happen, but has anyone tried talking to cisco lately? Theres no way to get to anyone with brains. (or it seems very difficult, anyway)
Edited by Capm, 10 September 2012 - 07:39 PM.
#150
Posted 12 September 2012 - 04:40 AM
#151
Posted 14 September 2012 - 12:09 PM
about subject #45 #145
Some more interesting info:
http://www.ecamgroup.com/Antronix E-Option Tech Document.pdf
http://www.motorola.....pdf?pLibItem=1
#152
Posted 14 September 2012 - 08:09 PM
#153
Posted 15 September 2012 - 02:21 PM
this is just the difference between doc1 and doc 3
#154
Posted 15 September 2012 - 04:47 PM
#155
Posted 16 September 2012 - 10:15 AM
#156
Posted 16 September 2012 - 05:02 PM
#157
Posted 23 September 2012 - 04:37 PM
Channel Lock Status Modulation Channel ID Frequency Power SNR Correctables Uncorrectables
1 Locked QAM256 1 783000000 Hz -4.4 dBmV 38.0 dB 30 0
2 Locked QAM256 2 789000000 Hz -4.7 dBmV 37.8 dB 94 0
3 Locked QAM256 3 795000000 Hz -5.2 dBmV 37.1 dB 119 0
4 Locked QAM256 4 801000000 Hz -5.4 dBmV 37.4 dB 251 0
5 Locked QAM256 5 807000000 Hz -6.2 dBmV 36.6 dB 552 0
6 Locked QAM256 6 813000000 Hz -6.0 dBmV 37.1 dB 372 2
7 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV 0.0 dB 0 0
8 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV 0.0 dB 0 0
Upstream Bonded Channels
Channel Lock Status US Channel Type Channel ID Symbol Rate Frequency Power
1 Locked TDMA and ATDMA 10 2560 Ksym/sec 33000000 Hz 32.2 dBmV
2 Locked TDMA and ATDMA 9 2560 Ksym/sec 36500000 Hz 32.2 dBmV
3 Locked TDMA and ATDMA 11 2560 Ksym/sec 29500000 Hz 32.2 dBmV
4 Locked TDMA and ATDMA 12 2560 Ksym/sec 24500000 Hz 32.2 dBmV
what does everyone think besides the upstream power level?
rebooted modem on thursday evening and bam upstream bonding!
Edited by motorola870, 23 September 2012 - 04:39 PM.
#158
Posted 23 September 2012 - 05:28 PM
#159
Posted 23 September 2012 - 07:08 PM
Why the heck are they bonding such small channels? Its a waste of card space.
well I would assume because they are still trying to clean the plant up and also they had 4 upstreams for along time that were 3.2MHz with with QAM16/QAM64 mixed mode on them and they just bonded them to give the modem about 61Mbps to play with for a upstream speed of 5Mbps on the 30/5 and 50/5 tiers. I am betting they might raise the tiers to 30/10 and 50/25 but that is only rumored right now for TWC in markets with competition from fiber optic providers.
#160
Posted 07 October 2012 - 04:50 AM
Read this: http://www.multichan...ocsis-31/139611
Similar Topics
Averna hooks up with Pace on DOCSIS certificationStarted by Guest_cablewithaview_* , 13 May 2013 |
|
|
||
DOCSIS 3.1: Here’s To The Next New Thing In Broadband!Started by Guest_olo131_* , 25 Oct 2012 |
|
|
||
Docsis 3.1 (Docsis NG "new generation")Started by Guest_olo131_* , 08 Oct 2012 |
|
|
||
TW Cable to Blend Ethernet With Docsis 3.0Started by Guest_cablewithaview_* , 08 Nov 2012 |
|
|
||
Keeping DOCSIS Happy and HealthyStarted by Guest_olo131_* , 25 Oct 2012 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









