232 replies to this topic

[olo131]

I haven't seen levels like that since the early 90's in a 330 mhz system.

olo131

[Kimbo]

I haven't seen levels like that since the early 90's in a 330 mhz system.

olo131

My system is currently at 450 MHz. We run trunks at 32/28 and bridgers and le's at 47/35.

[lashdawg]

Nah, we did a 1 Ghz upgrade in '07, with SA equipment. We used 32 value taps, that actually said 32/23. 32 for the forward and 23 for the return. Pretty damn cool taps actually.

[System Tech Senior]

47/36 on node, amp and le here.

[olo131]

Nah, we did a 1 Ghz upgrade in '07, with SA equipment. We used 32 value taps, that actually said 32/23. 32 for the forward and 23 for the return. Pretty damn cool taps actually.

What are you talking about You have a tap that will adjust the return aside from the foward???

Post a picture
olo131

[Kimbo]

Yeah please post a pic. Inquiring minds need to know.....

[cypherstream]

DOCSIS 3.0 is live



6.4 MHz 16QAM upstream though. Too noisy for 64QAM yet. Soon though.

[System Tech Senior]

You only have 18 meg with docsis 3?? We have 20 meg and haven't launched 3.0 yet. That upload is ***** though!

[System Tech Senior]

I do believe I need to see a pic of that tap also.

[RF Dr...]

47/36 on node, amp and le here.

46/37 here.
amps and le's.
except main leg of UBT's of course
44/34 on 6940's

[System Tech Senior]

Why not run unity gain from the node? Why set your node lower than your amps and le's?

[RF Dr...]

darn good question,
thats what the birth certifacate says and thats what thier set at.
found some stuff today that had me thinking "WTF"
fist active out of a node is a damn LE.
the next active is a UBT. has a 16 input pad but needed a 21!!!
just makes you shake your head!

[olo131]

DOCSIS 3.0 is live



6.4 MHz 16QAM upstream though. Too noisy for 64QAM yet. Soon though.

Ok try this awesome speeds........ This is got to be worth $40 a month

Attached Files

•  My_Speeds.JPG   42.53K   30 downloads

[System Tech Senior]

LOL.. Nice olo!

[olo131]

LOL.. Nice olo!

Maybe I should complain to someone........ Oh wait that's me.

olo131

[cypherstream]

Ok put in a new router (Netgear Wireless N). Had an old Linksys WRT-54g. Now this is more like it! Upload's a little taxed with another application running, but even with that going, it's still good!



edited to add modem page:
 modem.JPG   98.09K   28 downloads

Edited by cypherstream, 24 February 2010 - 07:53 PM.

[System Tech Senior]

That's more like it!

[olo131]

Hey Cypher Can I barrow some bandtwith makes my super fast 6 meg that only gets 2.5 look slow.....

olo131

[cypherstream]

Hey Cypher Can I barrow some bandtwith makes my super fast 6 meg that only gets 2.5 look slow.....

olo131

LOL, if there was a way to get it to you sure! Hope you guys get some D3 lovin' so you can experience those speeds. Pretty insane.

I'm still trying to get information on the plans to switch to 64QAM... if it's even necessary yet. Those are damn good upload speeds on 16QAM 6.4 MHz. Maybe they will keep pushing it off until it starts getting overloaded.

[System Tech Senior]

We already went 64 qam upstream. They're waiting for the rest of the eq to be set in the headend and we'll begin bonding the downstreams.. They claim we're going to launch 150meg down and 98meg up.. I'll wait for that to happen. Our FTTH overbuilder here offers 10 meg down and 10 meg up. We offer 20 meg down and 2 meg up. Customers seem to harp on the upload speed. We plan to deliver..