Telephone vs CATV
#41
Posted 17 June 2007 - 06:17 AM
#42
Posted 17 June 2007 - 02:04 PM
I believe there won't be much change on this contract but I'm guessing the big crunch will come on the next one but I could be wrong.
It may happen sooner than later.
If they sell BCE then everything will most likely break up and they'll sell everything that is costing them.
Copper is dead and that's what they'll want to dump along with everything associated with it.
They will never invest in fiber to the house now, it's too late to play catch up.
The company is into making money not spending it.
This has been in the works for a couple of decades now and the end is near, at least that's how I see it.
I don't think another union would help, we have little or nothing to bargain with.
The network pretty much runs itself now.
We're not happy ...until you're not happy
#43
Posted 23 October 2007 - 08:17 PM
I agree with that, but with one caveat. The speed is getting there, and wireless is cheap, and essentially instant to roll out compared with anything else. But unless wireless can provide service with the kind of near-absolute (almost there, but not quite) reliability that twisted pair can offer, they may continue as an also-ran. But I think they will meet, and with time, exceed the reliability of twisted pair, fiber, cable, you name it, because air is awfully hard to break*. The same can't be said for wires and light guides...
*We all break wind now and then, but that's not the same. ;)
~S~
#44
Posted 15 March 2008 - 11:16 PM
#45
Posted 16 March 2008 - 08:12 AM
In the larger centers, the plan is for FTTH as an over build
THANK A SOLDIER
#46
Posted 16 March 2008 - 10:34 AM
MORE GREAT SELECTIONS ON CELL PHONES FROM OTHERS AS WELL, CLICK TO EXPLORE MORE SAVINGS AND GREAT DEALS.
#47
Posted 20 June 2008 - 05:58 PM
baby bells have been around forever and will continue to be. copper trouble men and splicers will be needed ( maybe not in the same demand, but needed just the same ) for another 10-20 yrs. eventually the art of chasing troubles and putting a nice splice together will be all but forgotten when the guys they have retire cause lord knows they arent hiring copper guys anymore here in maryland.
i have to disagree on the wireless, theyve been saying that for years and i just dont see how wireless will ever have the reliability of " any " type of hard wire be it copper, fiber or catv.
baby bells will stay the leader in the game, even if they join the hunt a day late people will subscribe if for nothing more than the name itself...
#48
Posted 22 February 2009 - 05:07 PM
#49
Posted 22 February 2009 - 05:19 PM
Telephone has been around for around 100 years and will be for another 100 :o
I'm with High n mighty We where a phone company (Valley Telephone) a 100 years ago and know we are kicking ATT's a$$ on phones here.
But to be honest the overbuilder already knows what they have in it before they, build it and, sell it for a better price...
sorry I work for an overbuilder.
olo131

Want to win a FREE line-man.com T-shirt LOOK HERE and post "Count Me In" Good Luck!
#50
Posted 22 February 2009 - 06:42 PM
55% profit in video
70% internet
80% phone
So with these numbers, why would carriers go into video? As I said before, for survival.
MORE GREAT SELECTIONS ON CELL PHONES FROM OTHERS AS WELL, CLICK TO EXPLORE MORE SAVINGS AND GREAT DEALS.
#51
Posted 14 March 2009 - 01:12 AM
It could be modeled after the way some cell towers work. Fiber or microwave fed towers service an area and sync up directly to the customer's various devices. There will still be some plant to deal with in this scenario but overall reliability will increase.
I have also read of satellites that can provide all the needs of a city the size of Houston from one bird being developed, but I wonder about latency and round trip delay issues.
Probably a long way off, but the way technology leaps along, who knows? I remember having the clerk look up dad's credit card in "the book" 30 yrs ago, now I pay my toll driving 70.
but it would be dangerous to offer me the position" Mark Twain
#52
Posted 24 June 2009 - 06:55 PM
Will this tool help me on finding in house problems or is it mainly used out on the pole?
Any help with trying to use this tool would be great. Thanks in advance.
This is why telephone will win. We "Qwest" always get coax customers back. Usually it's because they cant find high shorts, grounds, opens in the IW. When I go to cut them over I find those issues and the customers say there service was always staticy. Yeah this is one of the best meters to use. Its quick, easy, and one of the only meters with a stress test.
#53
Posted 19 November 2009 - 10:23 AM
Boy you've got it all wrong. your 2 cents is just that, 2 cents.. We offer 20 meg down at Charter here in Tennessee, and we're releasing DOCSIS 3.0 beginning January 2010 which will bring 153meg down, with over 90 meg up. I hear this "how many people are on the line" crap all the time.. It doesn't make a difference about the COAX along the streets. It's called port congestion on the CMTS in the headend. We have 5 CMTS's in the headend where I am. We don't have a problem with port congestion, or as you say "too many people on the line" Do your homework before you slam the leaders of technology.
Broadband Maintenance Technician
CDE Lightband
Clarksville, TN
#54
Posted 26 February 2010 - 08:37 AM
#55
Posted 26 February 2010 - 11:53 AM
That's the trouble Slack, telcos think 150 bucks a month for only 50 meg is dirt cheap. Most telcos are living in the past.
Cable companies and overbuilders are doing it cheaper, way cheaper. Telcos still live in a world where 256k is worth
40 bucks, and 900k is worth 90 bucks, usually, because the telco is the only game in town. Plus that telco is most likely regulated to hell because it built itself up with RUS funds. It has to be a shock to the system now that all of that guaranteed money that the telcos have been getting is drying up. It's funny that when a telco goes FTTH suddeny they have a 3 meg service that now only costs 40 bucks. Most cable subscribers get 15 meg for 30 bucks.
I agree though, that whoever get's the FTTH will win, but they must be competitive. Case in point, my local telco has gone FTTH. They offered 10 meg, telephone, and video for 90 bucks. But only offer 2 email and 25 meg of webspace, total. Plus, the video has to come from that 10 meg, so if I'm watching TV, my bandwidth for surfing goes down. The local cable company gives me 15 meg down. 1 meg up, plus 70 channels analog video for 47 bucks a month, and that includes my modem rental. In addition, I get 7 email addresses, and 50 meg of webspace for each email address. So, I get that service from them, and my landline from the telco. Total of about 85 bucks a month. If the telco could give me the same service, I would take them in a heartbeat, but they just don't get it. They come from the world of the privileged telcos who used to have a guaranteed income, but the competition is from a world of the lean and hungry, and they'll stay lean to whisk those customers away from the telcos.
Dak
Edited by Dak, 02 March 2010 - 09:09 PM.
#56
Posted 26 February 2010 - 09:15 PM
Broadband Maintenance Technician
CDE Lightband
Clarksville, TN
#57
Posted 02 March 2010 - 07:52 AM
We are all brothers here, some phone, some cable, some power, some all of the above, working dangerous jobs to feed our kids, maintain our homes, living the dream. We may compete for customers, but we are all here to improve the lives of our customers and our families. I have never said a bad word about the guy working in the ped next to me, or on a neighboring strand. It is a job I love and hope to continue as the technology progresses, just the same as the Phone and Power Guys.
#58
Posted 02 March 2010 - 08:20 AM
Welcome Yamo2861, very well put
lightningrod
#59
Posted 02 March 2010 - 08:39 AM
#60
Posted 02 March 2010 - 02:53 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















